Danger in Sight: Eye Injuries in Racket and Stick Sports

Danger in Sight: Eye Injuries in Racket and Stick Sports

Epidemiological and biomechanical analysis of eye injuries in floorball, padel tennis and squash: risk profiles, physical mechanisms and preventive intervention strategies.

The evolution of recreational sports in recent decades has led to the emergence and popularization of highly dynamic disciplines that place specific demands on the human musculoskeletal system and the sensory organs. In this context, floorball (unihockey), padel tennis and squash have established themselves as three of the fastest-growing sports worldwide. Although they offer significant cardiovascular and social benefits, they share a critical risk profile: a disproportionately high incidence of severe eye injuries, primarily caused by direct impact from high-velocity projectiles or sticks/rackets in confined spaces.

Squash ball
280 km/h
Highest measured ball speed
Padel ball
200 km/h
Smash velocity at professional level
Floorball ball
130 km/h
Maximum shot velocity

1. Floorball – Injury Landscape and Epidemiology

Floorball is a fast indoor team sport with five field players plus a goalkeeper per team. Despite its image as a low-impact alternative to ice hockey, the data show a substantial injury incidence. Studies report rates between 2.4 and 4.1 injuries per 1,000 hours of exposure. The severity of these injuries varies considerably: 49 % are classified as mild (1–7 days off), 29 % as moderate (8–30 days off) and 22 % as severe (more than 30 days off). While the majority of trauma affects the lower extremities – particularly the ankle and the knee (~60 % of all cases) – facial and eye injuries occupy a critical position because they are often associated with long-term impairment.

Floorball – stick & ball
Lightweight perforated plastic ball (~23 g, Ø 72 mm) and a carbon-composite stick. Eye injuries occur primarily through stick blades and high-stick contact in tight duels.
Injury incidence by age group (per 1,000 hours of exposure)
U13
 
1.2
U16
 
2.2
U19
 
3.2
Adults
 
4.1
Category Value Source / Region
Annual eye injuries (Sweden) ~700 Swedish Floorball Federation
Share of severe ocular trauma 8–12 % Scandinavian cohort studies
Permanent visual impairment ~3 % Long-term follow-up

2. Padel – The Ophthalmological Challenge

Padel tennis combines elements of tennis and squash on a glass-and-mesh enclosed court (20 × 10 m). The use of a perforated solid racket and a slightly depressurized tennis ball, together with the rebound off the walls, creates an unpredictable trajectory environment. Ball speeds during a smash regularly reach 180–200 km/h, which – combined with the short distance between players (especially in doubles, the standard format) – generates an extreme risk for ocular trauma.

The padel boom
Over 30 million players worldwide (2024), with growth rates above 25 % per year in Europe. The injury statistics are following at a similar pace.
Causes of eye injuries in padel
Direct ball impact
 
65 %
Partner's racket
 
25 %
Rebound off the wall
 
10 %
Specification Value
Ball mass 56–59 g
Ball diameter 6.35–6.77 cm
Internal pressure 4.6–5.2 kg/cm²
Maximum smash speed ~200 km/h
Distance between doubles partners 2–4 m

3. Squash – Thermodynamics and Biomechanics of an Extreme Risk

Squash is, statistically speaking, the racket sport with the highest documented risk of severe eye injuries. The combination of a small, dense rubber ball (~24 g), confined court geometry (9.75 × 6.4 m) and the necessity for both players to occupy the same playing area produces a unique constellation of impact mechanisms. The kinetic energy of a squash ball at 250 km/h is sufficient to massively deform the orbital tissue.

E_kin = ½ · m · v²  →  0.5 × 0.024 kg × (69.4 m/s)² ≈ 57.8 J

Squash – the highest risk
The ball diameter (~40 mm) is smaller than the bony orbital opening, which means the impact energy is transferred directly onto the eyeball rather than being dispersed by the orbital rim.
Distribution of eye injury types in squash – hyphema dominates
Hyphema (anterior chamber bleeding)
 
55 %
Corneal abrasion / laceration
 
20 %
Retinal detachment
 
15 %
Orbital fracture
 
10 %

4. Comparative Pathophysiology – What Hits the Eye?

Floorball
Main cause: stick blade, high-sticking.
Mechanism: sharp / blunt edge trauma, often perforating.
Padel
Main cause: ball impact at short distance.
Mechanism: blunt trauma to the orbit, contusio bulbi.
Squash
Main cause: ball, fits inside the orbit.
Mechanism: direct globe deformation, hyphema, retinal damage.

5. International Standards for Eye Protection

Standard Region Sport scope Test criteria
ASTM F803 USA Squash, racquetball, basketball Ball impact at sport-specific velocity
ASTM F2713 USA Field hockey Stick and ball impact
EN 174 EU Ski / mountain sports goggles Optical and mechanical strength
ISO 18527-3 International Racket sports (squash, padel) Standardized ball impact at high velocity

6. Regulatory Outlook 2026

The International Floorball Federation (IFF) is examining a binding obligation to wear protective eyewear in all youth competitions starting from the 2026/27 season. In Sweden and Switzerland this rule already applies up to U16 in clubs. For padel, the World Padel Tour is in dialogue with manufacturers about the introduction of an ISO 18527-3 certified standard model, which is to be made available as a recommendation – initially without obligation – for amateur tournaments from 2026 onwards. Squash is the front-runner: World Squash and most national federations have been requiring certified protection (ASTM F803) for all junior competitions for years; in 2026 this regulation will be extended to senior amateur leagues in several European countries.

7. Conclusions and Recommendations

Floorball, padel and squash share a clearly definable risk profile for severe ocular trauma. Although the underlying mechanisms differ – stick blade impact, blunt ball trauma at short distance, and direct globe deformation by a small dense ball – the consequence is the same: a high proportion of injuries that are preventable. The literature consistently shows that certified polycarbonate goggles reduce the risk of severe eye injury by approximately 90 %.

The only solution: certified protective eyewear
❌ Without protective eyewear
High risk of permanent visual loss after a direct hit. Hyphema, retinal detachment and orbital fracture are typical injury patterns.
✅ With polycarbonate goggles
Risk minimized. Shatter-resistant material absorbs the impact energy and prevents penetration of the orbit. Reduction in severe injuries: ~90 %.

In conclusion, the protection of vision is a shared responsibility between federations, manufacturers and the athletes themselves. The technological solution in the form of polycarbonate protective goggles is available and highly effective; its broad adoption is the decisive factor in being able to enjoy the positive health benefits of these dynamic sports without the risk of life-altering visual impairment.

A data-driven analysis on sports medicine.